Skip to content
Tenet tax legal
  • PAYROLL HRMS
  • About us
  • Our service offerings
    • Tax Controversy and Dispute Resolution
    • Tax
    • Financial Advisory Services
    • Audit Accounting and Risk Services
  • Why choose Tenet tax & legal
  • Contact us
  • E Commerce Consulting Services

Sec. 36(1)(iii) disallowance was valid if Co. didn’t have sufficient funds to give advances to its sister concern

  • Home
  • Corporate Tax
  • Sec. 36(1)(iii) disallowance was valid if Co. didn’t have sufficient funds to give advances to its sister concern
Posted onon December 7, 2017

Tenet Tax Daily December 06 2017

By tenettax-team
Corporate Tax

Post navigation

Interconnect usage charges paid by ‘BSNL’ to foreign telecom operators were neither FTS nor Royalty
No TDS if sum paid to foreign co. was reimbursement of expenses with no income element: Mumbai ITAT

Latest Information

  • Accounting
  • Auditing Services
  • Corporate Tax
  • Individual Taxation
  • International Tax
  • Others

Our Service Offerings

  • PAYROLL HRMS
  • Audit Accounting and Risk Services
  • Financial Advisory Services
  • Tax
  • Tax Controversy and Dispute Resolution

Address

Delhi Office - M 26 Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019

Contact Us

Email – info@tenettaxlegal.com

Copyright © 2025 Tenet Tax & Legal Private Limited | Ostrich Business by Theme Ostrich.